

Still working on trying to make plexiglass hubcaps with an inner rim.

Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
I've seen the newest camaro,while the front fascia looks ok the design isn't as close to what the original 82 trans am shape was,especialy around the front headlights.sfusco3 wrote:I like the work you have done in the photoshopping of these pics. I think you should use pics of an actual 2014 model and not the older style, 2014 has a different front and rear facia I have a 2014 if you need me to take pics to you to use
Everyone has their opinion of what the coolest look for kitt to be.I've seen 2000-2002 trans ams where people placed tiny scanners into the nostrils on the hood.Some have cut out the middle partition to put in a scanner.Others have taken the banshee bumper and put it on a firehawk which looked great.To each his own.What appealed to Glen choosing the trans am were the lines and it being a new model type in 80's.89IROCNDoug wrote:Very nice job of photoshopping and I really like it overall!![]()
I just have minor complaints: I would rather have the black wheel caps solid instead of the see through kind that you have. Matt makes a good point about the wheels but I think we should go with what looks good and not worry about the stock wheels. The original KITT didn't have a stock nose or tail lights and I don't think we have to limit the exterior alterations to only those 2 things. So go with what looks good and if it happens to be the bowling caps like stock '82 TA's, then that's even better. I like the side scoop but I would like it better if it was more subtle and didn't stick out as much - a smoother integration. On the rear view, there is a 3rd brake light on the spoiler - no need for that because it is taken care of on the long tail light. One of the views has chrome door handles - I wouldn't want them chrome.
Of course a debate over a lot of this on a now 'older' 2010 version of the Camaro is all for naught because they would likely use the re-styled 2014 or newer Camaro at this point.
Right, I realize that there are different opinions on what looks good and that different years and models of cars would be represented in the differing opinions.Knight Racer wrote:Everyone has their opinion of what the coolest look for kitt to be.I've seen 2000-2002 trans ams where people placed tiny scanners into the nostrils on the hood.Some have cut out the middle partition to put in a scanner.Others have taken the banshee bumper and put it on a firehawk which looked great.To each his own.What appealed to Glen choosing the trans am were the lines and it being a new model type in 80's.89IROCNDoug wrote:Very nice job of photoshopping and I really like it overall!![]()
I just have minor complaints: I would rather have the black wheel caps solid instead of the see through kind that you have. Matt makes a good point about the wheels but I think we should go with what looks good and not worry about the stock wheels. The original KITT didn't have a stock nose or tail lights and I don't think we have to limit the exterior alterations to only those 2 things. So go with what looks good and if it happens to be the bowling caps like stock '82 TA's, then that's even better. I like the side scoop but I would like it better if it was more subtle and didn't stick out as much - a smoother integration. On the rear view, there is a 3rd brake light on the spoiler - no need for that because it is taken care of on the long tail light. One of the views has chrome door handles - I wouldn't want them chrome.
Of course a debate over a lot of this on a now 'older' 2010 version of the Camaro is all for naught because they would likely use the re-styled 2014 or newer Camaro at this point.
Well, at the end of the day buddy, it's your vision for KITT, so if you're happy with where you've taken it, then it's all good.Knight Racer wrote:I don't know, part of having the manipulation resemble Kitt is removing the rear passenger Windows.