kitt needing gas?
Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
- djshag69
- Operative
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 8:54 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
kitt needing gas?
i forget the name of the show in the first season i believe, devon gets pulled over and the cop breaks his tail light and gets him arrested. In that show kitt actually goes for gas with michael, i remember in the first show devon saying kitt is completely fuel efficient, i wonder how many miles to the gallon kitt did get to the mile, and why didn't he need gas in any other episode.
- knightimmortal
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Taos, NM, USA
- Contact:
The episode was No Big Thing.
The most likely reason why we never really saw KITT fuel up any other time, is because it is one of those functions that was a cute side line once, but otherwise, it had no real impact on the storyline, a lot like Michael going to the bathroom, or Bonnie brushing her hair.
KI
The most likely reason why we never really saw KITT fuel up any other time, is because it is one of those functions that was a cute side line once, but otherwise, it had no real impact on the storyline, a lot like Michael going to the bathroom, or Bonnie brushing her hair.
KI
- knightimmortal
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Taos, NM, USA
- Contact:
- Benjamin Knight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:05 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Grimsbly, Ontario, Canada
Hasn't someone asked this before?? Well it is a good questions. It seems the only reason KITT was running low is becasue he said that Bonnie's driving plan didn't inculde the "200 mile drive MK took with a women" on on the way. I am sure KITT gets great milage per liter or gallon. Wonder if there was ever a rato created for the show. It may have never been said but you never know. Lots of stuff for Star Trek is created but never used on a show! Hummm... Oh well
Benjamin Knight
Benjamin Knight
- cloudkitt
- FLAG Operative
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 11:34 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Well, I recall in soem 1st season dash shots it shows a guage that reads "100 Gallons" on the top. I just assumed he had a very large tank. But then after the alternative fuel race where he switches to liquid hydrogen, I thought he stayed with that.
Michael: "KITT! Where are ya?!"
K.I.T.T.: "I'm in your parking space, Michael, where else would I be?"
K.I.T.T.: "I'm in your parking space, Michael, where else would I be?"
- KalEl
- Volunteer
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Rochester, NY
100 gallons would be a lot of fuel. The tank built to hold that much would be huge and very visible. Also, being that there are 8 pounds to a gallon, adding 800 pounds of fuel would seriously hamper K.I.T.T.'s turbo boost range and height.cloudkitt wrote:Well, I recall in soem 1st season dash shots it shows a guage that reads "100 Gallons" on the top. I just assumed he had a very large tank. But then after the alternative fuel race where he switches to liquid hydrogen, I thought he stayed with that.
Although, if I were writing the script for the new KR movie, I would make K.I.T.T. come equipped with a cold fusion engine. Just pour some water into the fuel tank and the engine separates the Hydrogen and Oxygen powering the engine with the Hydrogen and sending pure oxygen out the exhaust pipe.
- knightimmortal
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Taos, NM, USA
- Contact:
I hate to tell you this, but if you wrote that kind of 'cold fusion' script, you'd either be sued by the creators of Back to the Future, or corrected in a rather displeasurable fashion.
Separating water is not cold fusion, not by any stretch of the imagination. It is exactly that, separation, if you want to really push it, fission. (though that deals more with separating the actual Hydrogen atom itself, rather than the separation of the H2O compound)
From the Scientific American:
Cold fusion claims to release measurable energy from fusion reactions at or near room temperature when deuterium is dissolved in a solid, usually palladium metal. The idea, which has its roots in research going back to the 1920s, is that hydrogen and its isotopes can dissolve to such high concentrations in certain solids that the hydrogen nuclei approach closer to one another than even in solid hydrogen. Furthermore, negative electrical charges from the electrons of the solid host partly cancel the repulsion between the nuclei. Early experiments did not detect any signs of fusion, however. Furthermore, modern theoretical calculations show that the proposed effects, while real, are much too small to produce detectable rates of fusion.
As you can see, we haven't even come near it, so the actual concept of cold fusion itself would be a very interesting prospect for a new KITT to run on.
The Water Separation concept...it's easily done. It's become an award winning Science Fair topic.
KI
Separating water is not cold fusion, not by any stretch of the imagination. It is exactly that, separation, if you want to really push it, fission. (though that deals more with separating the actual Hydrogen atom itself, rather than the separation of the H2O compound)
From the Scientific American:
Cold fusion claims to release measurable energy from fusion reactions at or near room temperature when deuterium is dissolved in a solid, usually palladium metal. The idea, which has its roots in research going back to the 1920s, is that hydrogen and its isotopes can dissolve to such high concentrations in certain solids that the hydrogen nuclei approach closer to one another than even in solid hydrogen. Furthermore, negative electrical charges from the electrons of the solid host partly cancel the repulsion between the nuclei. Early experiments did not detect any signs of fusion, however. Furthermore, modern theoretical calculations show that the proposed effects, while real, are much too small to produce detectable rates of fusion.
As you can see, we haven't even come near it, so the actual concept of cold fusion itself would be a very interesting prospect for a new KITT to run on.
The Water Separation concept...it's easily done. It's become an award winning Science Fair topic.
KI
- knightimmortal
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Taos, NM, USA
- Contact:
Not necessarily, for the most part, it is a chemical cooling agent to bring it down to a certain level, and all you would need is a certain amount of area to contain the cooling agent itself, for the amount that KITT was potentially using/regenerating, you would probably not need anything any larger than a standard gas tank area.
But it was a good thought.
KI
But it was a good thought.
KI
- knightimmortal
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Taos, NM, USA
- Contact:
Sorry, Arjun, but that's an assumption that that line means that KITT is not a petrol car. Because in the first season, he clearly has to make a gas stop, and later on, he also makes the comment that 100 miles to a gallon of gas would be something he would consider pleasing.
It was stated that KITT could run on any kind of fuel, and that comment was directed at the fact that they were in a 'gas-only' vehicle, and they ran out, not that KITT didn't run on gas. Where KITT's system could have converted any kind of combustible fuel in a hurry, if he did run out of gas.
KI
It was stated that KITT could run on any kind of fuel, and that comment was directed at the fact that they were in a 'gas-only' vehicle, and they ran out, not that KITT didn't run on gas. Where KITT's system could have converted any kind of combustible fuel in a hurry, if he did run out of gas.
KI
- Benjamin Knight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:05 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Grimsbly, Ontario, Canada
- Benjamin Knight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:05 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Grimsbly, Ontario, Canada
- jup
- FLAG Operative
- Posts: 1778
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- antispam: No
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 1982
- Location: SD, CA. USA | Web site: http://www.jupircbot.8m.com (jup's KR game project 'ghosts' here)
- Contact:
- Benjamin Knight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:05 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Grimsbly, Ontario, Canada
- Knight2000
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: UK
- knightimmortal
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Taos, NM, USA
- Contact:
Well, as we have said in previous discussions, some cars of that model year and earlier did have the gas fillup area behind the license plate.
As for how it disappeared when KITT's license plate flipped, I have a theory in the works that KITT's systems were like Lego clusters, and could be moved in a modular fashion to adapt to different areas when another cluster was introduced.
(Or the writers had a bit of a case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand was doing syndrome)
KI
As for how it disappeared when KITT's license plate flipped, I have a theory in the works that KITT's systems were like Lego clusters, and could be moved in a modular fashion to adapt to different areas when another cluster was introduced.
(Or the writers had a bit of a case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand was doing syndrome)
KI