Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Archive for discussions from 2006. Please post new discussions in the appropriate forum.
Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
-
K2000kid
- Operative
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Connecticut, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by K2000kid » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:17 pm
can anyone tell me what kind of car this could be? I have no idea where i got it but I put a scanner on it and it could work.
lemme know what you think

Theres no reason for increased volume, I'm scanning your interogitives quite satisfactorilly.
-
LadyV2000
- FLAG Assistant
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:41 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Post
by LadyV2000 » Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:15 pm
Way too futuristic. KITT would stick out like a sore thumb. Plus with the vehicle being so low to the ground, it would make landing a turbo boost impossible.
Flyer Guy: "You really a talking car?"
KITT: "No. I'm a tight end for the Chicago Bears!"
-
J-Knight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:59 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Renfrew, Scotland
Post
by J-Knight » Thu Jun 29, 2006 9:30 am
LadyV is right but awesome pic all the same!
Devon-"Shall we drink to the start of.."
Michael-"Of what?"
Devon-"One mans Dream"
-
Stargazer
- Operative
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Dallas, TX
Post
by Stargazer » Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:15 am
LadyV2000 wrote:Way too futuristic. KITT would stick out like a sore thumb. Plus with the vehicle being so low to the ground, it would make landing a turbo boost impossible.
KIFT was too low to the ground also..... thus no turbo boosts in that version.
No T-Tops for seat ejects.
I still can't get the horrible red paint out of my head.
What was the topic again????
-
Akaihiryuu
- Operative
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 12:29 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
-
Contact:
Post
by Akaihiryuu » Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:29 am
Stuff like turbo boosts and jumps can be done with CG nowadays...that could make the car look like it's actually doing the impossible things that it did in the series, instead of using quickly changing camera angles. It's funny when you see the jump car nearly break in half when it lands, then after a couple of quick camera changes KITT is there without a scratch.
-
ryytel
- Operative
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:20 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Drifting in Tokyo
Post
by ryytel » Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:20 pm
It looks fine to me, dont have nothing against when i have that kind of kitt replica. If the car looks outside like that, think how it would look inside pretty cool i think and that car might raise himself higher. if that car is in a tv show knight rider then it should be called '' Knight Rider 2'' if that car is included but still dont want to lose kitt's original shape
Knight Rider "Trust Doesnt Rust"
K.A.R.R. : Do you wish to drive, or shall I.
Tony : Go ahead.