Page 1 of 1

Ananova gets it's facts wrong?

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:42 am
by trissybabes
Reporting on David's divorce, news site Ananova reported the story like this:
The Hoff Ends His Marriage

If you're a fan of the Hoff - in a romantic way - you might be slightly happy to know he's on the market again.

But the news is also tinged with sadness, because it means that the former Baywatch hunk has filed for divorce.

He's been married to his wife, Pamela Bach, for 16 years, but Mr Hasselhoff has cited "irreconcilable differences" as the reason for their split at a Los Angeles court.

His publicist insists that they remain on good terms, saying: "The couple have agreed to an amicable settlement."

They tied the knot in 1989 and have two daughters together, Taylor-Ann, 15, and Hayley, 13.

Dave and Pam both starred in Baywatch, as well as some episodes of Knight Rider together.

We wish them well.
Now am I right in thinking that Pam was never in Knight Rider - it was Catherine Hickland he was married to then, wasn't it?

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:49 pm
by March2875
Actually Pam was in one episode of Knight Rider. She was in the fourth season episode "Knight Racer" she was the girlfriend of hitman extrodinaire Fredro Larane she was the blonde woman in the bathing suit that anwered the phone on the boat. Kitt picked her up on his scanners walking away when Michael said the line "Hmm uhm good on land too"

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:28 pm
by Lyn
I'm still smarting from the said split myself, so I hope the next news story about D. Hasselhoff will be much more positive.
I wish him the best as he goes through a difficult time, and hopefully he'll get his sense of humor back eventually.
Also, I hope his professional life will go better than his now-zilch personal life.