Page 1 of 1

William Daniels movie credit?

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 4:32 pm
by Michael Pajaro
Williams Daniels didn't receive on-screen credit for doing the voice of KITT. Assuming he returns for the movie, what would you like to see them do for his credit?

I know that the Screen Actors Guild and union rules are very specific and strict, and he may HAVE to have his name somewhere in there whether he or the producers want it or not. But should his name appear at the beginning of the film? Part me wants them to continue the tradition of NOT giving his name, and sort of adding to the mystique that KITT is just "KITT" and not an actor. On the other hand, it would be fun to finally cheer his name on the big screen.

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 4:50 pm
by Skav
I didn't think that any actor had to have their name in the credits because I know some films like 'friday 13th' where the actor playing the movie killer got his name removed because he didn't like how the film turned out.

maybe things have changed now though.

in any case, I think they should carry the tradition.

it makes the whole KR experience more authentic.

Skav

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 4:58 pm
by Michael Pajaro
Sometimes you'll see a credit like "A film by Alan Smithee". Producers or directors will specifically use the Alan name instead of theri own when they don't want to be associated with the project.

The Friday the 13th example may be a special case because Jason doesn't have any lines. If you don't speak, you don't have to be listed. I'm not sure about that, but I think it's a loophole.

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 5:15 pm
by Skav
Wow, never knew that. Thanks, Mike!!

Skav

William Daniels

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 7:18 pm
by KnightRider2000
The funny thing is william daniels is the former president of the screen actors guild. I guess the movie's coming out to late, LOL.

-KnightRider2000

Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:21 pm
by sarfraz
I suspect at the very least, he will appear in the end credits, and not at the start just to maintain tradition....theres a thought. Do you reckon that the movie opening will be a homage to the original KR opening...please let it be.

Sarfraz

Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 1:19 pm
by Knight Industries 3000
It's said that Whoopi Goldberg didn't want or get screen credit for playing Guinan in Star Trek Generations.

Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 6:39 pm
by Michael Pajaro
sarfraz wrote:Do you reckon that the movie opening will be a homage to the original KR opening...please let it be.
I don't think it will be an homage... The series credits shows too much of the car. Although I'm sure we will have a pretty good idea what the new KITT will look like before the movie is released, in terms of the actual story that is being told on screen, there should be a big "reveal" where we see KITT for the first time. Showing the original footage of KITT in the desert on the big screen would look cheesey, and refilming it using the new KITT would spoil the reveal.

Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 12:48 am
by Knight Industries 3000
Michael Pajaro wrote:Showing the original footage of KITT in the desert on the big screen would look cheesey, and refilming it using the new KITT would spoil the reveal.
Maybe they'll do something along the lines of what they did in that stupid Chips '99 TV movie: recreate the main title sequence shot for shot in the middle of the movie with newly shot footage of the new vehicle. :lol:

(Of course, Chips '99 had another Knight Rider connection... it featured the Knight 4000.)

Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 1:15 pm
by sarfraz
Michael Pajaro wrote:
sarfraz wrote:Do you reckon that the movie opening will be a homage to the original KR opening...please let it be.
I don't think it will be an homage... The series credits shows too much of the car. Although I'm sure we will have a pretty good idea what the new KITT will look like before the movie is released, in terms of the actual story that is being told on screen, there should be a big "reveal" where we see KITT for the first time. Showing the original footage of KITT in the desert on the big screen would look cheesey, and refilming it using the new KITT would spoil the reveal.
Assuming there is a new KITT, we also assume that the original KITT somehow gets destroyed, or put away in a museum etc! What about refilming the opening with the original car with only a hint of the new car. Kinda like the very small opening in KR2000. You saw the old car, and only a flash of the rear of the new car. The KR2000 opening was far too short to start the film, but I think you know what I'm getting at.

Sarfraz

Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 1:41 pm
by KARR Engineer
Waah! Me want old KITT! Me want Knight 2000...
:cry:
I want them to remake the opening with the Knight 2000, as I want it to be used.

Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 3:25 pm
by Skav
I really feel they should have approached the credits to the Pilot in a different way. They should not have shown the car at all, and done something else to keep the audience wondering.

Really, the beginning credits were poor as it makes the scene where Michael looks at the scanner in the dark for the first time, pointless.

Skav