What I took away from seeing it again
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:36 am
I have to say, once you get all the shock out of your system after you watch it the first time the second viewing is even that more enjoyable.
But you know after reading a lot of the complaints on this board and many others I think what one of the missing keys is this: When you take such an iconic show like Knight Rider and you try and reincarnate it its quite hard to do. as a matter of fact i don't envy the production team at all. they must of knew the slack they were going to get in some way. But hats off they went ahead and made their vision of the next Knight Rider.
I will say I think what they missed here is a true link to the past. It's hard to create a fictitious character in this world like Charles Graiman and link him from past to present. Especially when you have such a following of the original series.
The True link I believe, and just my opinion here, would have been KITT. William Daniels to be exact. Keep the Mustang, and the rest of the story, thats fine, but the original KITT would have had all the knowledge about the secret of Mike's real father, Sarah, everyone. The Dynamic of the relationships with KITT would have been greatly enhanced, with great writing of course. KITT knowing that this Michael Knight's son would be in my opinion be great television. The banter, the sensitivity, the guidance. It would have been great to see.
Now don't get me wrong, I liked Kilmer in this. Look it's obvious this new KITT wasn't ready to fully go into action, and I mean that in the sense he was still being worked on. Like the scene on the road when he stated all the tests weren't completed. Kilmer brought that rawness to it as well as his dialogue conveyed that.
But I think a lot of people would have looked past all of the issues with the film if they had that bridge from old to new define for them in such a way.
It worked for transformers.
But you know after reading a lot of the complaints on this board and many others I think what one of the missing keys is this: When you take such an iconic show like Knight Rider and you try and reincarnate it its quite hard to do. as a matter of fact i don't envy the production team at all. they must of knew the slack they were going to get in some way. But hats off they went ahead and made their vision of the next Knight Rider.
I will say I think what they missed here is a true link to the past. It's hard to create a fictitious character in this world like Charles Graiman and link him from past to present. Especially when you have such a following of the original series.
The True link I believe, and just my opinion here, would have been KITT. William Daniels to be exact. Keep the Mustang, and the rest of the story, thats fine, but the original KITT would have had all the knowledge about the secret of Mike's real father, Sarah, everyone. The Dynamic of the relationships with KITT would have been greatly enhanced, with great writing of course. KITT knowing that this Michael Knight's son would be in my opinion be great television. The banter, the sensitivity, the guidance. It would have been great to see.
Now don't get me wrong, I liked Kilmer in this. Look it's obvious this new KITT wasn't ready to fully go into action, and I mean that in the sense he was still being worked on. Like the scene on the road when he stated all the tests weren't completed. Kilmer brought that rawness to it as well as his dialogue conveyed that.
But I think a lot of people would have looked past all of the issues with the film if they had that bridge from old to new define for them in such a way.
It worked for transformers.