Re: NBC Knight Rider DVD
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:37 am
Thanks for the one you made Garth and the link to the other one,it gives me options for my DVD.
the oldest and most popular knight rider site
https://www.knightrideronline.com/forum/
https://www.knightrideronline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11104
It was never a matter of who's is better, if i wanted to i could make an exact replica of his cover. It was a question why show it off & say im not sharing this with anyone unless they trade or pay me is what i got out of it & thats what bothered me when he didnt make the original art or own the rights. It should be shared freely. And frankly i would like a good reason why he cant share this with whoever wants it, dont give me that youll bootleg it because thats exactly what he's doing. A true fan would want other fanatics to have it! Not for a price when sending email is free!greelywinger wrote:ms KEN said (and I quote) "I made my own personal DVD with a cover"
Keyword here is personal.
He just posted it to share what it looked like.
Not to make tons of copies for everybody.
Which, BTW, is pretty awesome itself.
I liked his cover best, but that's just my opinion.
I could do the same thing, but my life is busy right now. I'll be happy to just catch the series.
Darryl
GarthKnight08 wrote:
It was a question why show it off & say im not sharing this with anyone unless they trade or pay me is what i got out of it & thats what bothered me when he didnt make the original art or own the rights.
Agreed, but the effort put into making the cover was his and he doesn't have to share in if he doesn't want to.GarthKnight08 wrote:A true fan would want other fanatics to have it! Not for a price when sending email is free!
More then likely it will be removed, people like that sicken me. I have no problem if you want to make one for yourself & share it with your friends but to pubicly sell it like that your just asking for trouble.jgcoombes wrote:oh dear! Someone trying to make a quick buck! with one of the covers on here!![]()
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... =p3907.m29
It was only a matter of time before it happened tho!GarthKnight08 wrote:More then likely it will be removed, people like that sicken me. I have no problem if you want to make one for yourself & share it with your friends but to pubicly sell it like that your just asking for trouble.jgcoombes wrote:oh dear! Someone trying to make a quick buck! with one of the covers on here!![]()
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... =p3907.m29
I wonder how long it will take to get removed?PHOENIXZERO wrote:They tore it... How lazy is that? Then again look at the user's name....
Feel free to report it, look for the report link on the page.
Man, let me tell you I've been fighting with that image to get it positioned right on the DVD so the hole in the middle of the disc doesn't ruin the image. I wanted to use my LightScribe burner to etch an image on the disc, but I think I may need to do some screencaps since I haven't liked how the poster image looks on the DVD.Lost Knight wrote:I was also thinking of using the same poster image to use on a DVD label maker to make it more professional-looking.
Ya know I ignored this thread because frankly I'm sick of your ignorant and arrogant comments in general on this board... but wow awesome accusation there buddy way to confirm my opinion of you. And no those images aren't freely available, if you do your homework I had to do a few hours of photo shop to that poster to remove the logos and text from the original myspace background, I've also ran many color corrections to get it to look good in print... and hell to date NO ONE ELSE HAS A COPY OF THIS BUT ME. But again thanks for accusing me of being a bootlegger.GarthKnight08 wrote:dont give me that youll bootleg it because thats exactly what he's doing.
Well i also thought this was dead & buried since you brought it up again here we go, did you or did you not make illegal copies of Knight Rider 2000 plus other copyrighted material & sell them? Sell, trade, whatever its still a bootleg no matter how you look at it. And my whole point in this thread was your arrogance & i could really care less what opinion you have of me as i see i rattled your cage a bit calling you out on things that arent cool! The images are freely availible, just because you used the clone tool in photoshop to remove logos & text doesnt mean that you did the original artwork yourself! Its not hard whatsoever to copy & paste & color in something, so stop whining about how hard you worked at it. Im not somebody thats new at this sort of thing so that isnt gonna fly with me!msKEN wrote:Ya know I ignored this thread because frankly I'm sick of your ignorant and arrogant comments in general on this board... but wow awesome accusation there buddy way to confirm my opinion of you. And no those images aren't freely available, if you do your homework I had to do a few hours of photo shop to that poster to remove the logos and text from the original myspace background, I've also ran many color corrections to get it to look good in print... and hell to date NO ONE ELSE HAS A COPY OF THIS BUT ME. But again thanks for accusing me of being a bootlegger.GarthKnight08 wrote:dont give me that youll bootleg it because thats exactly what he's doing.
- Attacking someone's artistic ability with Photoshop (or another digital editor) is entirely not cool and does not help in supporting your arguement with Ken. As an artist myself, I take offence to that comment.GarthKnight08 wrote:Its not hard whatsoever to copy & paste & color in something, so stop whining about how hard you worked at it. Im not somebody thats new at this sort of thing so that isnt gonna fly with me!
Couldnt resist could you, sorry but im not even gonna read one of your page long comments vic, i stopped after the first paragraph & caught a line at the end. So ill just say this.. i wasnt attacking anybodys ability & ive been in the community since the beginning, dont let my join date fool you, now ive said all im going to say in this thread.victor kros wrote:- Attacking someone's artistic ability with Photoshop (or another digital editor) is entirely not cool and does not help in supporting your arguement with Ken. As an artist myself, I take offence to that comment.GarthKnight08 wrote:Its not hard whatsoever to copy & paste & color in something, so stop whining about how hard you worked at it. Im not somebody thats new at this sort of thing so that isnt gonna fly with me!
:
You just couldn't keep your bloody nose out of it, don't be a troll. For the record, I have absolutely nothing against MSKen and I never have. As far as "substance", I have a few bootlegs I bought off of eBay from MSKen. He even emailed me the alternate cover for the "original" bloopers dvd, although the KR game that he was sending out with it doesn't work without a patched .exe. Knight Rider 2000 looked like crap but it's all that you could get at the time. So before you start spouting off why don't you just stick with what you know and not what you THINK you know, which is apparently everything. Have a nice day Richard.victor kros wrote:What right do you have to accuse him of bootlegging? That's just a low blow without any substance in my opinion. I believe he's actually safer keeping his high resolution files to himself because it wasn't his cover that was bootlegged on ebay, it was yours
GarthKnight08 wrote:Couldnt resist could you, sorry but im not even gonna read one of your page long comments vic, i stopped after the first paragraph & caught a line at the end. So ill just say this.. i wasnt attacking anybodys ability & ive been in the community since the beginning, dont let my join date fool you, now ive said all im going to say in this thread.victor kros wrote:- Attacking someone's artistic ability with Photoshop (or another digital editor) is entirely not cool and does not help in supporting your arguement with Ken. As an artist myself, I take offence to that comment.GarthKnight08 wrote:Its not hard whatsoever to copy & paste & color in something, so stop whining about how hard you worked at it. Im not somebody thats new at this sort of thing so that isnt gonna fly with me!
:
- I do not believe I was talking to you, where in my post or his post for that matter is YOUR name mentioned? It says GartheKnight08's name in my quote. I believe creating friction by getting involved in someone else's conversation that doesn't involve you would be considered "trolling". I like this quote of yours Stylz, "why don't you just stick with what you know and not what you THINK you know, which is apparently everything" because apparently what YOU THINK you know is that I was addressing you in my last post which was specifically written to MSKen and GartheKnight08, NOT you. Practice what you preach.Stylez wrote:You just couldn't keep your bloody nose out of it, don't be a troll. For the record, I have absolutely nothing against MSKen and I never have. As far as "substance", I have a few bootlegs I bought off of eBay from MSKen. He even emailed me the alternate cover for the "original" bloopers dvd, although the KR game that he was sending out with it doesn't work without a patched .exe. Knight Rider 2000 looked like crap but it's all that you could get at the time. So before you start spouting off why don't you just stick with what you know and not what you THINK you know, which is apparently everything. Have a nice day Richard.victor kros wrote:What right do you have to accuse him of bootlegging? That's just a low blow without any substance in my opinion. I believe he's actually safer keeping his high resolution files to himself because it wasn't his cover that was bootlegged on ebay, it was yours
The point is nobody was talking to YOU in this thread, but you couldn't keep your big mouth shut. I'm not trolling because I bought my stuff from Ken, I was adding the "substance" you were crying about. So again, Richard, keep your nose out of it.victor kros wrote:- I do not believe I was talking to you, where in my post or his post for that matter is YOUR name mentioned? It says GartheKnight08's name in my quote. I believe creating friction by getting involved in someone else's conversation that doesn't involve you would be considered "trolling". I like this quote of yours Stylz, "why don't you just stick with what you know and not what you THINK you know, which is apparently everything" because apparently what YOU THINK you know is that I was addressing you in my last post which was specifically written to MSKen and GartheKnight08, NOT you. Practice what you preach.
This is not an attack or an insult, you can throw the insults if you wish and I will stick to the facts of the matter.
=VK=
- With all due respect, the facts are you were not asked to be involved in the discussion I started between MSKen and Gartheknight08 AFTER it turned into a volitile attack on a member of the community and a friend of mine who deserves better. I did stay out of it until Garthe unquestionably degraded Ken's artistic skills with this quote below no matter how he tries to spin it and quite frankly he didn't have the respect to read my full reply so I honestly cannot take what he says at this point seriously.Stylez wrote:The point is nobody was talking to YOU in this thread, but you couldn't keep your big mouth shut. I'm not trolling because I bought my stuff from Ken, I was adding the "substance" you were crying about. So again, Richard, keep your nose out of it.victor kros wrote:- I do not believe I was talking to you, where in my post or his post for that matter is YOUR name mentioned? It says GartheKnight08's name in my quote. I believe creating friction by getting involved in someone else's conversation that doesn't involve you would be considered "trolling". I like this quote of yours Stylz, "why don't you just stick with what you know and not what you THINK you know, which is apparently everything" because apparently what YOU THINK you know is that I was addressing you in my last post which was specifically written to MSKen and GartheKnight08, NOT you. Practice what you preach.
This is not an attack or an insult, you can throw the insults if you wish and I will stick to the facts of the matter.
=VK=
Your amateurish skills speak otherwise, thats why KITT and Mike look bloated and stretched on your covers and you don't have a clue about balance. You didn't rattle my cage any I could careless what you think of me as well. Apparently your cage has been rattled pretty bad though lol. Heck as long as I am drawing you out to be the ass that you are, then so be it. I could careless about your join date as well, I've been here since the beginning jack back when this site was ran on the old boards back in 1998. Does that give me any better street credit here then you? Nope. Means nothing to me or anyone else. So you can go scream that off a mountain for all I care, still makes you an arrogant a$$hole and a worthless keyboard warrior.GarthKnight08 wrote:Im not somebody thats new at this sort of thing so that isnt gonna fly with me!
Which is why garthknights dvd covers are being used for this guy to bootleg. Irony at its best. Funny since the site garthknight put it on at cdcovers.cc is FOR BOOTLEGGERS. Funny how my point is made about why I refuse to put this one up for download. I have nothing further to say to any of you. And trust me when I say this is the end of me sharing anything Knight Rider with any of you.Point being that bastard still got £24 for something that was recorded off tv and not his own work, now theres another copy on his listing for the same damn thing, this is bootlegging at its finest and shouldn't be aloud no matter what, i wouldn't disagree with a kr fan downloading this pilot to watch for there own use, but to sell it and make money of it is pure piracy and and stinks of greed, and only hurts others and is only another nail in the coffin as far getting a series made.