I would humbly submit to Victor that the producers are VERY aware of the fact that it's meant to be a family show; and at that point it becomes a subjective measure as far as what constitutes family entertainment. It's good to remember that times have indeed changed, and so has the family show. You're basing that criticism on criteria that may not be valid today.
Forgive me if I am not seeing that in the tv spots or script details that have surfaced. I want you to understand Shapeshifter, despite our differences in the past (especially with the backdoor pilot)
I do want this show to succeed and I am in no way out to hinder its goals to succeed at this point in time.
I do not exactly support the new show's choices of direction, but I do respect them.
It's been a very long road of changes and again there are no longer camps to be concerned with. As a Knight Rider fan in general (and not a representive of Larson) I have certain expectations I would like to have met at least half way in order to feel
more comfortable accepting these new directions the show is choosing to go in.
I have no ill will towards you thus far, despite our difference of opinion in the past. I had to approach certain conflicts during the time they occured and the necessity to do so has now changed over the duration of the year.
From a design standpoint, I still do not agree with some of their choices but that's my opinion. Since this is now being spun as the "new mythology" of Knight Rider ala Star Trek TOS and Star Trek The Next Generation, they're going to do what they feel they need to update what came before and gear it towards modern audiences.
I have always been a feirce supporter of the original series and everything that it stood for. I'm not saying it was perfect by any means but it had a unique approach to things during its time that quite frankly
I'm not ready to let go of. When you modify someone's memories of a show or alter their perceptions of what it should be, you run into conflict. This is the unfortunate side effect of choosing to update a popular concept or reboot it.
I am sure there may be some simular concerns with the motion picture but the difference here is
time and place. We're starting over from the beginning and they are continuing where the older mythology left off. They have more responsiblity to establish connections to the past.
You say the producers are VERY AWARE of the concern for younger kids watching this program, I respectfully and humbly disagree. Based on what has been disclosed from marketing and interviews, their target audience thus far as been the fast and the furious, bling bling, more
teenage demographic and until I see otherwise, that's how I feel about it.
As far as basing my criticism on criteria that may not be valid today, with all due respect
good parenting and good morals never go out of style, and never become dated. What is acceptable is up to the parent to decide what is best for their kids and if they prefer a more teenage direction, that's their choice.
Again this is my opinion and my observation.
I am not condeming anyone, I'm not making accusations, I am just saying please
keep these things in mind as they go along and if they do that, everything is cool. Again I repeat that I believe these two properties can co-exist but they will most definately go off in their own directions. It's up to the fans to decide which version they prefer or if they prefer both.
=VK=
