K.I.T.T. from an engineering perspective...
Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
K.I.T.T. from an engineering perspective...
Hello all, I'm a long time Knight Rider fan, but a newb to this forum. Anyhow... On with my point/argument...
I read some of the faq and came across something I felt like bringing up. K.I.T.T.'s body is composed of the theoretical material tri-helical MBS (plasteele 1000), which has a yield point, aka Young's Modulus, of 570,000 psi, right? Well, as impressive as that may sound, typical cold rolled low carbon steel, that the body of nearly everyone's car is made of, has a Young's Modulus of 30,000,000 psi. In that light, K.I.T.T.'s body (if the panels are the same thickness as a typical Formula Firebird) is 98% weaker than the body of the production car it was based on. Even if the body was made of aluminum if would still be 33% as strong as the cars we (except Saturn owners I suppose) all drive everyday. Food for thought.
Dunno how many hard core physics dorks there are on this forum, but I guess I'm fixin' to find out.
I read some of the faq and came across something I felt like bringing up. K.I.T.T.'s body is composed of the theoretical material tri-helical MBS (plasteele 1000), which has a yield point, aka Young's Modulus, of 570,000 psi, right? Well, as impressive as that may sound, typical cold rolled low carbon steel, that the body of nearly everyone's car is made of, has a Young's Modulus of 30,000,000 psi. In that light, K.I.T.T.'s body (if the panels are the same thickness as a typical Formula Firebird) is 98% weaker than the body of the production car it was based on. Even if the body was made of aluminum if would still be 33% as strong as the cars we (except Saturn owners I suppose) all drive everyday. Food for thought.
Dunno how many hard core physics dorks there are on this forum, but I guess I'm fixin' to find out.
-
- Operative
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:39 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Cleveland Ohio
Haha...
Young's Modulus is the measure of when something is going to permanently deform. For instance, steel has what a lot of folks call a "memory". If you take a paper clip and bend it just a little it bounces back to its original form. If you bend it beyond the point at which it bounces back, you've exceeded young's modulus and permanently deformed it. If you've ever crushed a Coke can in your hand you've exceeded the 10,000,000 pound per square inch Young's Modulus for Aluminum.
This is what too many years in engineering school will do to you.
Young's Modulus is the measure of when something is going to permanently deform. For instance, steel has what a lot of folks call a "memory". If you take a paper clip and bend it just a little it bounces back to its original form. If you bend it beyond the point at which it bounces back, you've exceeded young's modulus and permanently deformed it. If you've ever crushed a Coke can in your hand you've exceeded the 10,000,000 pound per square inch Young's Modulus for Aluminum.
This is what too many years in engineering school will do to you.
-
- KRO Podcaster (retired)
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:55 pm
Well, from a story perspective, writers try to base some of their story on science but not really "true" science in all aspects. Just enough to make it sound high-tech to the average viewer or reader.
Like Star Trek's infamous "technobabble" for instance. Some of it could be true, some theoretically true, some when analyzed would end up false.
From what I gathered from the story anyway, KITT's MBS was actually some spray-on molecular bonding solution that was a special formula that no one person knew the whole formula. Three people were chosen to know only a part of the formula. One was Devon, I am sure. I forgot who the other two are. I'd imagine the other would be Bonnie. I don't know if Michael would even be the third since when they gave the car to him, he was rather computer illiterate, let alone anything else at that moment. I think it was Wilton Knight that knew the other part maybe or maybe they told Michael later after Wilton died?
Dunno exactly how that went...
Like Star Trek's infamous "technobabble" for instance. Some of it could be true, some theoretically true, some when analyzed would end up false.
From what I gathered from the story anyway, KITT's MBS was actually some spray-on molecular bonding solution that was a special formula that no one person knew the whole formula. Three people were chosen to know only a part of the formula. One was Devon, I am sure. I forgot who the other two are. I'd imagine the other would be Bonnie. I don't know if Michael would even be the third since when they gave the car to him, he was rather computer illiterate, let alone anything else at that moment. I think it was Wilton Knight that knew the other part maybe or maybe they told Michael later after Wilton died?
Dunno exactly how that went...
-
- Operative
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:39 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Cleveland Ohio
- Michael Pajaro
- Advisor
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
I've been out of school too long so I had to do some refrshing.
Young's Modulus is not the same as Yield Point.
The Yield Point represents the amount of force it takes beyond which a material is permanently distorted.
Young's Modulus is a ratio showing the rate of change of a material as it is being stressed.
EDIT: doing some casual browsing, I'm finding average steel yield points of 80-90 kpsi depending on the alloy (some are stronger). This would be much less than KITT's 570 kpsi.
Young's Modulus is not the same as Yield Point.
The Yield Point represents the amount of force it takes beyond which a material is permanently distorted.
Young's Modulus is a ratio showing the rate of change of a material as it is being stressed.
EDIT: doing some casual browsing, I'm finding average steel yield points of 80-90 kpsi depending on the alloy (some are stronger). This would be much less than KITT's 570 kpsi.
-
- KRO Podcaster (retired)
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:55 pm
- Michael Pajaro
- Advisor
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
- Darknight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Huntington/Wayne area, WV
- Contact:
The interesting thing about all of this is that, in order to crash through the rigid barriers as he did in the show, KITT would have had to have very high rigidity. That is, any flexing would have absorbed part of the energy necessary to penetrate other rigid objects. Yet, materials with higher yield points tend to be more flexible, like spring steel, because they are able to temporarily deform to absorb loads or shocks. This is an apparent paradox in that KITT must have had ultra-high rigidity to penetrate reinforced concrete and also to obliterate KARR as he did, but he never seemed to suffer stress cracks or anything like that, except when doused with some MBS neutralizer. Perhaps the MBS was really a fusion of metallic and ceramic properties, being both rigid and resistant to deformation.
Thoughts anyone?
DK
P.S. I'm the other geek who likes to consider the real-life physics of a fantasy car, which is becoming a little more feasible all the while...
Thoughts anyone?
DK
P.S. I'm the other geek who likes to consider the real-life physics of a fantasy car, which is becoming a little more feasible all the while...
- cloudkitt
- FLAG Operative
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 11:34 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Well he would have had to have unbelieveably high rigidity because the problem with an invincible car is, if you hit an object you CAN'T penetrate, the driver will die as the car as ABSOLUTELY no give. So they had to be sure that KITT would always go THROUGH obstacles.
Michael: "KITT! Where are ya?!"
K.I.T.T.: "I'm in your parking space, Michael, where else would I be?"
K.I.T.T.: "I'm in your parking space, Michael, where else would I be?"
- HondaSiR
- FLAG Assistant
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:58 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Asia Pacific
I have no idea how many times KITT has done that, but I remember him smashing through a mountain once in order to see the gems/treasure inside (which IIRC wasn't really that valuable). I can't remember the episode name though.Maxwelhse wrote:How many times did KITT smash through an extremely hard object without being air born?
- KARR_Knight
- Rookie
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:40 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact:
-
- Operative
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:39 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Cleveland Ohio
-
- KRO Podcaster (retired)
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:55 pm
- Michael Pajaro
- Advisor
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
My hat's off to you sir...Maxwelhse wrote:If the wheels are off of the ground at the time of impact perhaps the suspension was designed to act as a tuning fork to dampen the blow?
Although I'm sure the writers never thought about that during the show, and I doubt it could ever work in real life, the idea behind it is brilliant (in a ridiculous sort of way!)
- Darknight
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Huntington/Wayne area, WV
- Contact:
The frame would be the tuning fork, which would, in theory, vibrate upon impact with another object. The tires, wheels and suspension would be like the hand that stops the resonation of the tuning fork after it has been struck.
I understood what you meant, though. Strange, isn't it, that in the show KITT usually hit hard objects in mid-air? I have always assumed that it is due to Turboboost, but I just thought of another, more far-fetched idea.
If you hit a wall or something while on the ground, the wall has only three ways to break. The wall material may go above you and to both sides as you penetrate, but it may not go beneath you. By striking objects in mid-air, KITT had four directions for broken material to pass around him as he went through. This is, of course, relative motion, since the objects usually remain fairly stationary, and KITT moves in relation to them.
Also, say you want to burst through a concrete wall. The strongest portion of the wall is the closest to the ground for several reasons which I won't mention right now. This enabled him to penetrate the relatively weaker areas, thus saving much damage to his "Alpha" circuit, haha.
Wasn't that the one which most frequently gave him trouble from jarring impacts?
DK
I understood what you meant, though. Strange, isn't it, that in the show KITT usually hit hard objects in mid-air? I have always assumed that it is due to Turboboost, but I just thought of another, more far-fetched idea.
If you hit a wall or something while on the ground, the wall has only three ways to break. The wall material may go above you and to both sides as you penetrate, but it may not go beneath you. By striking objects in mid-air, KITT had four directions for broken material to pass around him as he went through. This is, of course, relative motion, since the objects usually remain fairly stationary, and KITT moves in relation to them.
Also, say you want to burst through a concrete wall. The strongest portion of the wall is the closest to the ground for several reasons which I won't mention right now. This enabled him to penetrate the relatively weaker areas, thus saving much damage to his "Alpha" circuit, haha.
Wasn't that the one which most frequently gave him trouble from jarring impacts?
DK
-
- KRO Podcaster (retired)
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:55 pm
-
- KRO Podcaster (retired)
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:55 pm
I am not sure on that one, but I know he "gets off" on (pardon the expression) microjamming electric power generators. (like in the 1st season episode where that accountant was framed for murder - too lazy/tired to think of the ep name). Michael was in trouble and he got him but Michael was like "What took you so long" and KITT told him "I came as quickly as I could."
Sorry, sick mind neps, I understand if you want to delete this post and chastize me.
But I tried not to get too graphic here and used normal words. HOpe this was ok. It was just too funny when I saw that in the episode.
Sorry, sick mind neps, I understand if you want to delete this post and chastize me.
But I tried not to get too graphic here and used normal words. HOpe this was ok. It was just too funny when I saw that in the episode.
- LadyV2000
- FLAG Assistant
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:41 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
LOL! That's from Final Verdict. It's the part when Michael disguises himself as the electrician. I think KITT something to the degree of "...the sensation is quite intoxicating."FuzzieDice wrote:I am not sure on that one, but I know he "gets off" on (pardon the expression) microjamming electric power generators. (like in the 1st season episode where that accountant was framed for murder - too lazy/tired to think of the ep name). Michael was in trouble and he got him but Michael was like "What took you so long" and KITT told him "I came as quickly as I could."
Sorry, sick mind neps, I understand if you want to delete this post and chastize me.
But I tried not to get too graphic here and used normal words. HOpe this was ok. It was just too funny when I saw that in the episode.
Flyer Guy: "You really a talking car?"
KITT: "No. I'm a tight end for the Chicago Bears!"
KITT: "No. I'm a tight end for the Chicago Bears!"
-
- KRO Podcaster (retired)
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:55 pm